Overcoming undesirable resilience in the global food system
A recent paper argues that the global food system needs to become both more sustainable and more resilient to environmental and economic shocks. Defining resilience as “the resistance or rapid recovery of system interrelationships and functions after perturbation”, the paper points to existing examples of “undesirable” resilience, which inhibit the transformation of the food system to a more sustainable state.
- A lack of knowledge may discourage farmers or other food system actors from adopting more sustainable practices.
- Pioneers of new practices may face greater costs and risks than later adopters (see first-mover disadvantage).
- Some food system actors may benefit financially from the status quo and therefore have an incentive to delay system reform.
- Governments are hesitant to incorporate the cost of environmental damage into food prices, because it could cause unpopular food price rises and a loss of competitiveness.
- Cognitive bias towards the status quo (see status quo bias and system justification).
- Soil degradation may mean that, in some areas, farming is no longer viable without high levels of chemical input.
- Loss of species that feed on pests may mean that pesticide-free farming is not viable in some areas.
The authors argue that there may be “windows of opportunity” during which system change is more viable, for example, when government regulations are being revised, or when there are growing calls for food systems reform from citizens. The authors also call for coordinated action across multiple leverage points, rather than isolated attempts to solve problems one by one.
The paper also argues that making subsets of the global food system relatively independent from the global system - for example, a “city region” food system - could help to lock in any successful transformations towards sustainability, by insulating the region from forces that might undo its progress.
Our current global food system – from food production to consumption, including manufacture, packaging, transport, retail and associated businesses – is responsible for extensive negative social and environmental impacts which threaten the long-term well-being of society. This has led to increasing calls from science–policy organizations for major reform and transformation of the global food system. However, our knowledge regarding food system transformations is fragmented and this is hindering the development of co-ordinated solutions. Here, we collate recent research across several academic disciplines and sectors in order to better understand the mechanisms that ‘lock-in’ food systems to unsustainable states.
Oliver, T.H., Boyd, E., Balcombe, K., Benton, T.G., Bullock, J.M., Donovan, D., Feola, G., Heard, M., Mace, G.M., Mortimer, S.R. and Nunes, R.J., 2018. Overcoming undesirable resilience in the global food system. Global Sustainability, 1, pp.1-9.
Read the full paper here. See also the video Webinar: Food Systems Resilience in the Foodsource video library. For more research on the concept of and applications of resilience, see the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
While some of the food system challenges facing humanity are local, in an interconnected world, adopting a global perspective is essential. Many environmental issues, such as climate change, need supranational commitments and action to be addressed effectively. Due to ever increasing global trade flows, prices of commodities are connected through space; a drought in Romania may thus increase the price of wheat in Zimbabwe.
More like this
- International Law and Agroecological Husbandry
- Kid's advertising can Influence adult brand loyalty
- Unravelling the food-health nexus: Addressing practices, political economy, and power relations to build healthier food systems
- Book: Food Utopias- Reimagining citizenship, ethics and community
- Free webinars: Climate change urban food initiative